Political Activism

I received my Bachelor of Arts (B.A.) degree in the study of Political Science, with a focus on International Affairs (in fact, my major was International Relations until that field of study was folded into the general GVPT curriculum). I credit my interest in affaires politiques to having grown up in a family where Dad was a diplomat.

During my late high school years, the Vietnam War was raging, and I, being of draft age, became more and more disillusioned with the U.S.A.’s lack of commitment to winning that conflict. The media focused on body counts, and the horror of the Mỹ Lai massacre continued to erode my faith in how the U. S. was pursuing that war, seemingly to add to the pockets of industrialists at the expense of American lives. I walked in the Moratorium March on Washington on November 15, 1969. I had graduated high school just months before.

Vietnam faded into memory, as I did not serve in the armed forces, and did not have direct experience with the war. I matriculated college while in Europe, and began my study of International Relations. I saw, first-hand, how communism turned countries into soul-less, grey landscapes, and how the free enterprise system allowed people to succeed. Even though I was no longer marching in protest, my political education continued. I even ran for student body president, and was defeated by less than a half dozen votes.

Then came marriage, a career, and family. I still read, watched and listened to political items; when you live within spitting distance of the nation’s capitol, it’s hard not to. But other than vote in elections, I stayed away from getting involved.

That all changed recently. Virginia, my adopted home, has been becoming more and more tyrannical, in large part supported by anti-American or control-freak types, George Soros, Michael Bloomberg, and others. One of the most successful states in the union one day, seemingly overnight, became another bastion of “progressivism” (I purposely do not capitalize the word). Following the 2019 elections (Virginia holds off-year elections) the entire General Assembly became Democrat-controlled. No sooner had they danced their victory dance, they began putting legislation on the table to reduce the “birthplace of presidents” to the “burial place of human rights.” I won’t go into the numerous bills proposed that will overturn Virginia’s history, increase taxes, and infringe on God-given liberties, but I will say that I’ve awakened to a movement I do not see being beneficial to Virginians.

On Monday, January 20, the official celebration of Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday, I attended a rally in Virginia’s capital city, Richmond. The rally was a demonstration against the stated proposals that in many peoples’ opinion (mine included) were anti-Constitutional. I was taken back to that day 51 years ago. I wasn’t being rebellious, I wasn’t being threatening, I was being present. I stood up for what I believe.

Maybe this is a turning point. I think it’s too early to tell. What I believe is that if people like me just sit and expect other people to march, demonstrate and attempt to make a point, I will have surrendered my privilege as an American citizen.

The Armory

I don’t profess to be a Constitutional scholar, but I do proclaim to be a Constitutional adherent.  This means that I believe the Constitution is and was the document that described how the United States of America should be governed; that neither the Constitution nor the government grants rights to the people, but rather enumerates the rights bestowed upon man by God, and limits the government’s ability to restrict or revoke them.

Thus, I believe the Second Amendment was presented in that order to demonstrate that the First Amendment’s protections of free speech, free assembly and the free exercise of religion was backed up by the force of arms, should the government ever become tyrannical.  To that end, I am part of a “well regulated militia.”  As a gun owner, I attend classes, train regularly, clean and inspect my firearms, and do not break the law or behave in a manner that would draw attention or disdain.

Much of the reason that I behave the way I do is because owning and carrying a gun is a tremendous responsibility.  Because I have the means to defend myself with deadly force, and understand the repercussions of doing so, I prefer to avoid confrontations or situations where I would have to use my gun.  Pulling a gun is the very last resort; it means that I am in a position of having to defend myself or someone else from lethal harm with no other recourse.

Years ago, the very idea of carrying a concealed weapon was so far from my mind that I would have rebelled at the thought.  That was before the growing incidences of “active shooter” reports and the shadow war that is being waged against fundamentalist terrorists.  Knowing that the police are not legally obligated to protect anyone (see Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. Ct. of Ap., 1981)), it becomes clear that the Constitution affirms a person’s right to defend himself.

Thus, I am now a gun owner.  In fact, I find I really enjoy going to the range and learning how to shoot.  I’ve started a small collection of guns, and appreciate their mechanical engineering and their aesthetics.  Here then, are some photos (incorporating one of my other interests) of my weapons.

Sig Sauer P938 9mm Semi-Automatic Pistol

Sig Sauer P938 9mm Semi-Automatic Pistol

My first gun. A Sig Sauer P938.  This is a subcompact 9mm (caliber) semi-automatic pistol that is modeled after the Browning M1911 that was the standard issue sidearm of the U. S. Armed Forces from its introduction in 1911 (hence its name) to 1986.  The 1911 is still favored by a large number of gun owners today.

 

S&W M&P9 Pro C.O.R.E.

Smith & Wesson M&P9 Pro C.O.R.E.

Next, is a Smith & Wesson M&P (designated for “Military and Police”) 9mm Pro Competition Optics Ready Equipment (C.O.R.E.) .  This is a full-sized handgun, and on it I’ve mounted what is known as a “red dot” sight. The sight adds a bright red dot that lines up with the gun’s sights and lets the shooter focus on the target quickly and accurately.  Red dot sights are becoming the standard in competition shooting.

Springfield Armory XD-S .45 ACP 3.3"

Springfield Armory XD-S .45 ACP 3.3″

Wanting to go to a larger caliber, yet stay in the compact (i.e., carry-able) size, I added a Springfield Armory XD-S subcompact pistol in .45 ACP.  With a 3.3″ barrel, this little handgun can pack a terrific punch!

Physics would suggest a .45 caliber round would produce too much recoil for a weapon this size to handle, but I’m happy to report Springfield has managed to make this a very “shootable” gun!

Here are some group shots.

Pistol Trio

Trio of Pistols

The trio posing together.

Second Amendment

Second Amendment

Recognition? Or Robbery?

I received an unsolicited email this morning that, due to filtering on my email account, went into the “junk mail” folder.  The only reason I was even aware of it, was that when I went to empty the folder’s contents, I saw the subject line: “Still Time to RSVP – Running From Office Book Signing and Panel Discussion.”

Excuse me? I never wrote a book.

But two women, affiliated with the American University’s Women & Politics Institute School of Public Affairs did.

NOT my book!

NOT my book – Running From Office

I won’t claim “prior art,” but I will state for the record that this site’s name predates the publication of the book, which is published by Oxford University Press and is copyright 2015 (link to Amazon here).  I will also state for the record that I have no interest, commercial or otherwise, in either the book, the authors, or the school.

My intent in posting this “disclaimer” is that if you found this site through an online search for “Running From Office,” and you were looking for information on the book, thanks, but you’ve landed on the wrong page.  On the other hand, if you’re looking for personal observations on running, technology, photography and general philosophy from a snarky, opinionated, aging geek, then welcome – this may be the site for you!

Is It Time For Article V?

Image

Liberty Amendments Cover

This past weekend I have become increasingly aware of a possible legal way to reduce the growing federal government overreach and reduction of individual liberties. I first learned of the new book by Constitutional expert, author and radio personality Mark Levin, The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic.

Then, I happened across an interview with a man whose name I didn’t catch, who was speaking of something called The Madison Coalition.

James Madison has been called the “political philosopher of the Constitution.” It was his brilliance that resulted in the three separate but equal branches of government, and the system of checks and balances.

James_MadisonBut even Madison knew that the system wasn’t perfect. He knew that people and organizations naturally seek to grow in size, influence and power. Thus, built into the Constitution was Article V, which details the mechanism for how the Constitution may be amended. It states,

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Not once in the history of the republic has a constitutional convention been called via the Article V route. The possibility of “rogue” constituents and the premise of a mass re-writing or overturning of the Constitution are given as reasons for this. But Article V has its own built-in protections against this possibility. Nevertheless, the Madison Coalition seeks to educate legislators at state and local levels and encourage them to support the Madison Amendment.

The Madison Coalition encourages both State leaders and Members of Congress to work for the eventual adoption of the Madison Amendment to permanently and constitutionally guarantee the right of 34 states who propose an identical Amendment to limit the scope of a Convention they call to an up or down vote on that specific Amendment.

Congress and the president seem to have grown deaf ears. The purpose of the Constitution was to limit the powers of the federal government, and the Tenth Amendment specifically states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” I think it’s time the people took back their power.